Money and Finance

Student Notes from Buffett Meeting Feb 15, 2008

Emory:

With the popularity of "Fortune's Formula" and the Kelly Criterion, there seems to be a lot of debate in the value community regarding diversification vs. concentration. I know where you side in that discussion, but was curious if you could tell us more about your process for position sizing or averaging down.

Buffett:

I have 2 views on diversification. If you are a professional and have confidence, then I would advocate lots of concentration. For everyone else, if it's not your game, participate in total diversification. The economy will do fine over time. Make sure you don't buy at the wrong price or the wrong time. That's what most people should do, buy a cheap index fund and slowly dollar cost average into it. If you try to be just a little bit smart, spending an hour a week investing, you're liable to be really dumb.

If it's your game, diversification doesn't make sense. It's crazy to put money into your 20th choice rather than your 1st choice. "Lebron James" analogy. If you have Lebron James on your team, don't take him out of the game just to make room for someone else. If you have a harem of 40 women, you never really get to know any of them well.

Charlie and I operated mostly with 5 positions. If I were running 50, 100, 200 million, I would have 80% in 5 positions, with 25% for the largest. In 1964 I found a position I was willing to go heavier into, up to 40%. I told investors they could pull their money out. None did. The position was American Express after the Salad Oil Scandal. In 1951 I put the bulk of my net worth into GEICO. Later in 1998, LTCM was in trouble. With the spread between the on-the-run versus off-the-run 30 year Treasury bonds, I would have been willing to put 75% of my portfolio into it. There were various times I would have gone up to 75%, even in the past few years. If it's your game and you really know your business, you can load up.

Over the past 50-60 years, Charlie and I have never permanently lost more than 2% of our personal worth on a position. We've suffered quotational loss, 50% movements. That's why you should never borrow money. We don't want to get into situations where anyone can pull the rug out from under our feet.

In stocks, it's the only place where when things go on sale, people get unhappy. If I like a business, then it makes sense to buy more at 20 than at 30. If McDonalds reduces the price of hamburgers, I think it's great.

- Links
I will be mostly without internet for the next couple of weeks. I have a few quotes and book excerpts scheduled, but this may be the last compilation of links during that time. AMA on Charlie Munger: What did Charlie Munger Learn from Phil Fisher? (LINK)...

- A Quick Diversification Thought...
An old post worth reviewing: Warren Buffett on Diversification - 1966 I was reminded of Buffett's thoughts as I was once again thinking about optimal portfolio size for the "know something" investor. If you can consistently find ideas where...

- Seth Klarman On Position Sizing
I posted this a couple of years ago (HERE), but since there seems to be a lot of new readers to the site, I thought maybe it would be good to post again. The quote below is my transcription from one of Klarman’s answers at the Graham & Dodd Breakfast...

- A Portfolio Warren Buffett Would Love
As manager of the $6.8 billion Fairholme fund, which he launched in 1997, Bruce Berkowitz is on the hunt for undervalued companies with strong managers and plenty of free cash. Rather than building a traditional, diversified portfolio, Miami-based Fairholme—named...

- What's Your Weight?
No I'm not asking you to divulge your body weight, although if that will help you with any weight loss goals you have feel free to do so. The weight I'm referring to has to do with your portfolio. I think we all understand the importance of...

Money and Finance