Hollywood Success: Luck or Skill? - 2006 Article by Leonard Mlodinow
The magic of Hollywood success—how can one account for it? Were the executives at Fox and Sony who gambled more than $300 million to create the hits “X-Men: The Last Stand” and “The Da Vinci Code” visionaries? Were those at Universal responsible for the box-office disaster “United 93” and their peers at Warner Bros. and Virtual Studios who pumped $160 million into the flop “Poseidon” just boneheads?
The 2006 summer blockbuster season is upon us, one of the two times each year (the other is Christmas) when a film studio’s hopes for black ink are decided by the gods of movie fortune—namely, you and me. Americans may not scurry with enthusiasm to vote for our presidents, but come summer, we do vote early and often for the films we love, to the tune of about $200 million each weekend. For the people who make the movies, it’s either champagne or Prozac as a river of green flows through Tinseltown, dragging careers with it, sometimes for a happy, wild ride, sometimes directly into a rock.
But are the rewards (and punishments) of the Hollywood game deserved, or does luck play a far more important role in box-office success (and failure) than people imagine?
We all understand that genius doesn’t guarantee success, but it’s seductive to assume that success must come from genius. As a former Hollywood scriptwriter, I understand the comfort in hiring by track record. Yet as a scientist who has taught the mathematics of randomness at Caltech, I also am aware that track records can deceive. That no one can know whether a film will hit or miss has been an uncomfortable suspicion in Hollywood at least since novelist and screenwriter William Goldman enunciated it in his classic 1983 book “Adventures in the Screen Trade.” If Goldman is right and a future film’s performance is unpredictable, then there is no way studio executives or producers, despite all their swagger, can have a better track record at choosing projects than an ape throwing darts at a dartboard.
That’s a bold statement, but these days it is hardly conjecture: With each passing year the unpredictability of film revenue is supported by more and more academic research.
………………..
Related book: The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives
-
- Howard Marks Quote
From The Most Important Thing: The investment world is not an orderly and logical place where the future can be predicted and specific actions always produce specific results. The truth is, much in investing is ruled by luck. Some may prefer to call it...
- Talks At Google: Michael Mauboussin, "the Success Equation: Untangling Skill And Luck"
Link to video ................ Related book: The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports, and Investing Related previous post: AIC 2014 Keynote: The Success Equation - Untangling Skill and Luck (Michael Mauboussin) [H/T ValueWalk]...
- Michael Mauboussin On Bloomberg (video)
Found via The Big Picture. Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Michael Mauboussin, chief investment strategist at Legg Mason Capital Management Inc., talks about his new book "The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports, and Investing." Mauboussin...
- Randomness And The Lost Lesson Of Bill Miller
A related quote from Nassim Taleb that I posted on Twitter this morning: “Recall that the survivorship bias depends on the size of the initial population. The information that a person derived some profits in the past, just by itself, is neither meaningful...
- Essential Investing Advice You Cannot Afford To Overlook
The following advices come front Alan Haft on an e-book that I obtained titled, You can Never be too Rich. I strongly believe that gaining knowledge is crucial to any journey. Anyway, Top 10 Lessons Hollywood teaches us about Investing. LESSONS Lesson...