Money and Finance

A Lifesaving Checklist - By Atul Gawande

This was a follow-up article (in 2007) from Dr. Gawande to the article I posted a couple of days ago. I recommend reading “The Checklist” article first.

IN Bethesda, Md., in a squat building off a suburban parkway, sits a small federal agency called the Office for Human Research Protections. Its aim is to protect people. But lately you have to wonder. Consider this recent case.

A year ago, researchers at Johns Hopkins University published the results of a program that instituted in nearly every intensive care unit in Michigan a simple five-step checklist designed to prevent certain hospital infections. It reminds doctors to make sure, for example, that before putting large intravenous lines into patients, they actually wash their hands and don a sterile gown and gloves.

The results were stunning. Within three months, the rate of bloodstream infections from these I.V. lines fell by two-thirds. The average I.C.U. cut its infection rate from 4 percent to zero. Over 18 months, the program saved more than 1,500 lives and nearly $200 million.

Yet this past month, the Office for Human Research Protections shut the program down. The agency issued notice to the researchers and the Michigan Health and Hospital Association that, by introducing a checklist and tracking the results without written, informed consent from each patient and health-care provider, they had violated scientific ethics regulations. Johns Hopkins had to halt not only the program in Michigan but also its plans to extend it to hospitals in New Jersey and Rhode Island.

The government’s decision was bizarre and dangerous. But there was a certain blinkered logic to it, which went like this: A checklist is an alteration in medical care no less than an experimental drug is. Studying an experimental drug in people without federal monitoring and explicit written permission from each patient is unethical and illegal. Therefore it is no less unethical and illegal to do the same with a checklist. Indeed, a checklist may require even more stringent oversight, the administration ruled, because the data gathered in testing it could put not only the patients but also the doctors at risk — by exposing how poorly some of them follow basic infection-prevention procedures.

………………..

Related link:

www.gawande.com/articles.htm

- Atul Gawande And Charles Munger On Why More Health Care Isn't Better
Link to article: Atul Gawande And Charles Munger On Why More Health Care Isn't Better American health care is obsessed with more. But the industry is beginning to realize that more isn’t always what’s best for patients. Dr. Atul Gawande,...

- How I Learnt The Power Of Checklists – By John Kay
Found via Abnormal Returns. Mr Gawande discovered that the good checklist is short but not too short. If the list is long, none of the items on it are taken very seriously. You can easily persuade people to agree to things when you ask them to mechanically...

- The Manual Of Ideas: Jacob Wolinsky's Interview With Guy Spier
I can, however, talk a little bit about creating the checklist and provide some examples. The process of creating a checklist is very simple and works the same way the Federal Aviation Administration does it. You look for mistakes — yours, mine, Warren...

- Malcolm Gladwell Reviews Atul Gawande's Latest Book: The Checklist Manifesto
I can't wait to read this book! As Charlie Munger says: "Checklist routines avoid a lot of errors. You should have all this elementary [worldly] wisdom and then you should go through a mental checklist in order to use it. There is no other procedure...

- The Checklist - By Atul Gawande
This is the article that helped inspire Mohnish Pabrai to take Charlie Munger’s thoughts on checklists and establish a physical checklist to run his investment ideas through. At his annual meeting, he mentioned that he has about 60 items currently on...

Money and Finance